801 owners club

Don't know, if it helps, but did you check the nude pics of the 801?
Well, it’s easier to see the o2 sensors there on the pipes than in my dark storage unit. 😂
We only have sun 09:00-15:00 here now, but I’ll roll it out and do a proper search some day soon.
 

It’s possible to see 2 o2 sensors here, #27 & #28, but what is #29 (Edit: I mean 26,27,28)? - it’s not listed in the parts list.

IMG_7289.jpeg
To me it looks like a third exhaust sensor.
 
Last edited:

It’s possible to see 2 o2 sensors here, #27 & #28, but what is #29 ? - it’s not listed in the parts list.

View attachment 6364
To me it looks like a third exhaust sensor.

29 or 28?

29 is the screw; 28 ist the Oxygen sensor, 26 and 27 are the O2 sensors.


Bildschirmfoto 2024-12-23 um 21.53.44.jpg

Bildschirmfoto 2024-12-23 um 21.54.18.jpg

Bildschirmfoto 2024-12-23 um 21.54.34.jpg
 
Is the 2024 Duke 790 already "Euro 5+" (like the 801) or still "Euro 5"?
If you search with the KTM-parts-finder the Oxygen sensor is not listed.


View attachment 6368
I missed your answer before I posted. I wrote the wrong numbers. Yes, there seems to be a difference here. Two sensors for the 790 vs 3 sensors for the 801. That could be a problem if I install the FuelX for the 790 using only two connectors.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Tom
IMG_7293.jpeg
Same parts numbers, except for the third sensor.

What’s the difference between “o2 sensor” and “oxygen sensor”? 😂
 
Last edited:
The Oxygen sensor seems to be part of the Euro 5+ regulations.

From my understanding, the Oxygen sensor checks the exhaust gases behind the cat and gives an error message if there are any deviations from standard.
 
The Oxygen sensor seems to be part of the Euro 5+ regulations.

From my understanding, the Oxygen sensor checks the exhaust gases behind the cat and gives an error message if there are any deviations from standard.
According to Powertronics, there are only two o2 sensors so it might be possible that the third one only has the “check for malfunction” function. They say I can buy and use the Duke 790 FuelX.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Tom
IMG_7297.jpeg
Done! I’ll keep you updated on the install and results. The FuelX Pro+ has a disconnectable map switcher, so I might just leave the switch in the standard configuration and disconnect it.
 
I don't hope so, but maybe you were a tad too fast with your order...
I've just read several Norden 901 threads and it seems to be a big difference between Euro 4, Euro 5 and especially Euro 5+.
5+ seems to be very sensitive to changes to the system; the oxygen sensor is causing the mail function codes.
I just stumbled upon the fact that the Coober solution is supposed to be fully compatible with the Euro 5+ Svartpilen and Vitpilen 801.
So maybe it would be the better solution?

 
I don't hope so, but maybe you were a tad too fast with your order...
I've just read several Norden 901 threads and it seems to be a big difference between Euro 4, Euro 5 and especially Euro 5+.
5+ seems to be very sensitive to changes to the system; the oxygen sensor is causing the mail function codes.
I just stumbled upon the fact that the Coober solution is supposed to be fully compatible with the Euro 5+ Svartpilen and Vitpilen 801.
So maybe it would be the better solution?

I know, I took a chance. Worst possible outcome is I’ll have to return it. Ordered it within EU so I have 14 days to return it after receiving.

Edit:
IMG_7298.jpeg
The FuelX Pro+ is available for the Norden 901 as well so hopefully it won’t be a problem.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Tom
I know, I took a chance. Worst possible outcome is I’ll have to return it. Ordered it within EU so I have 14 days to return it after receiving.

Edit:
View attachment 6374
The FuelX Pro+ is available for the Norden 901 as well so hopefully it won’t be a problem.

(y) but the 2022-2023 is the Euro 5 version; the 2024 is Euro 5+...
 
(y) but the 2022-2023 is the Euro 5 version; the 2024 is Euro 5+...
Yes, but they haven’t updated the website yet. The Coober LM also only connects to the two lambda sensors on the pipes, not the one on the cat.
 
Can/will you test-ride the bike with the Fuel-X? or is it already too cold; today we had the first snow of the year here it the north of Germany...
We have had some snow as well and it’s -6*c so I’ll be happy if I can successfully install it without getting fault messages. If it works I’ll let it run for 10min for the ECU to cycle through everything. I’ll have to wait for the snow to clear before I can test it. I had the Fuelx Lite on my 401 which worked well. Mostly looking for a fix for stalling. Any power gains are a bonus.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Tom
IMG_7310.jpegIMG_7311.webpIMG_7057.webp
First picture is mainly marketing. Second shows the different maps available. I had the FuelX Lite on the 401 so I didn’t fiddle with the maps/settings. It’s possible to disconnect the map selector on the FuelX Pro+ so I’ll probably set it in 7 and disconnect it.

Third picture shows Coobers testing to find out the difference between closed and open loop. It seems the 790 engine has a quite large closed loop so hopefully I’ll be experience some power gains. The 401 (2022) felt a lot better with the FuelX compared it to stock.
 
Two graphs I found; they're from a Duke 890 with the Coober-Box; the results with the FuelX should be about the same.
The AFR is near 13,2; with a "good" (not too small) muffler some power gain between 5000 and 8000 rpm seems to be possible.

Duke890_Coober_01a.jpg

Duke890_Coober_02a.jpg
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom