I would venture to say the 'pilen is better than most Japanese bikes, but the best Japanese bikes, well... you get what you pay for.
I've owned 7 Japanese bikes, from 1980 to 2015, and I've ridden and wrenched on many more. I'm a mech engineer and designer and work part-time in a shop for fun. I have lots of hands-on exp with motorcycles.
When I'm writing about "design," I'm talking about mechanical design - how things go together, how they work, how they are to wrench on, whether the designers considered maintenance considerations in their design, and, or course, reliability and functionality.
The Vit/Svart has some clever design aspects (eg how the panels connect over the gas tank then get secured with the neon yellow plastic piece. Fit together, locking items in place, and done well. Another example is of their floating mount points in some key positions - they function just fine but avoid very difficult design and manufacturing tolerance issues with the multiple plastic, interlocking pieces.) but it also suffers from some that suffer from design-over-functionality. This is my perspective after quite a bit of experience on it and others. There is a definite difference between the Japanese bikes and this bike. And the Japanese are superior on this aspect.
Regarding price, remember the original price on the Vit was ~$12k USD. So the "you get what you pay for" concept doesn't apply here. Yes, they dropped the price by a third and that made it much more reasonable, but the 2018 purchasers got it in the shorts.
There are longstanding issues regarding this bike and design that are recalled or "fixed as needed". The CAN problem can be extreme, as can the "magnet fell out of kickstand sensor" issue. This, I have never seen on a Japanese motorcycle that I've worked on or owned. There must be some out there, but not that I've owned. My last, just before the Svart 701 was the FZ-07. It was my favorite bike of all time. Just a great bike and the Jap design and quality was there as well - and this is a "cheap" Jap bike, not one of the expensive ones.
My point is that this bike has workability and design limitations that I see as compromises for aesthetics and visuals. AND it has a significant list of recurring problems, some that are serious. Add to that Husky's casual response to some of these issues, and my support wanes. (eg they have not "fixed" the clutch slave cylinder issue, they just replace it when it blows. This is crazy, as it strands riders without a clutch AND in some circumstances can absolutely be a safety issue. What are people doing as a fix on this issue? Replacing it with a reliable aftermarket one. Several demerits for Husky.)
Again, I like this bike, but in contrast to others I've owned and worked on, it's not up to the Jap bikes quality of design and robustness, and I disagree with the statement: "better than most Japanese bikes". Respectfully.
My 2 cents.